From this chart, it can be observed that approximately 32.8% of our audiences are 14 years old or below, while 27.7% fall within the 15~20 age range. This distribution indicates that the majority of the participants are adolescents. As the survey was sent through the school email system, junior and senior high students are more likely to access and complete the form. Understanding the age profile of respondents is essential, as age influences exposure to energy-related topics and shapes perception formed largely through education, rather than professional or household experience. Therefore, subsequent responses primarily reflect the viewpoints of younger individuals.

According to the pie chart, over half of the respondents’ educational level lies in the junior high school category, accounting for over half of the total. Although there is no significant correlation between the respondents’ educational background and their respective replies, a notably higher participation rate among junior high students was evident. This trend may be attributed to the integration of environmental awareness themes in the school’s curriculum, which encourages students’ engagement in topics relating to current environmental challenges faced globally.

The diagram illustrates that students form the major occupational group among respondents, constituting the largest segment with a percentage of 56.9%. Although there is no correlation between the respondents’ occupation and their respective replies, the dominance of students can be explained by the survey’s distribution method and the school, as well as the growing emphasis on environmental issues in education. Increased exposure to topics such as climate change, renewable energy, and sustainability has heightened students’ interest and willingness to explore related issues. 

The question evaluates the public’s perception of Taiwan’s potential energy shortage, collecting information on the matter of an average Taiwanese’s assumption of Taiwan’s current power supply. According to the illustration of the diagram above, respondents who believed the nation’s current power supply is adequate comprised a significant proportion of the diagram, standing at 54.9%.This dominance of the sector indicates that the majority of the public perceived the nation as capable of meeting its demands. Such confidence implies a belief that existing energy infrastructure and storage capacity are sufficient to withstand external distributions, including natural disasters or supply interruptions. However, this perception may underestimate underlying challenges such as dependence on energy limits and limited reserve capacity.  

The illustration queries respondents’ understanding regarding Taiwan's measures to reduce the load on its power system. As illustrated in the chart, the most frequently selected options relate to the development and promotion of the energy storage industry, and storing electricity for use during peak demand periods, indicating a relatively high awareness of energy storage-based solutions. This suggests that respondents are increasingly familiar with the role of energy storage systems in balancing supply and demand, particularly during periods of high electricity consumption. In contrast, options involving methods of traditional fossil fuel extraction and mass energy production methods received moderate selection rates, reflecting an understanding that these methods continue to contribute to Taiwan’s energy supply, though they may not be perceived as long-term or sustainable solutions. Meanwhile, renewable-based approaches, such as constructing sustainable energy facilities, biogas power production, and geothermal power plants, were selected less frequently. This indicates limited public awareness of the diversity and practical implementation of alternative energy technologies currently being explored or developed. 

The chart above demonstrates public opinion on the green energy development trend. The majority of respondents (56.9%) believe Taiwan still relies heavily on coal and gas power plants, while the proportion of sustainable energy is gradually increasing. The nuclear industry placed second owned percentage of 24.3%, whilst renewable energy was presented third with 11.1% of the population viewing it as the future trend in Taiwan. The result indicates Taiwan still relies heavily on coal and gas power plants, where traditional energy sources dominate the energy field. Although the proportion of sustainable energy is perceived to be gradually increasing, renewable energy is not yet viewed as a leading power source. Underestimating future green energy development could be attributed to its high upfront cost associated with renewable energy infrastructure. Without adequate energy storage capacity to ensure a stable and reliable power supply, coal and gas power plants continue to play a critical role. Overall, the results suggest that while the public recognizes progress in the renewable energy fields, concerns remain about the pace of transition and insufficient integration of energy storage systems.

This chart demonstrates the public view on investing in the energy storage industry. According to the chart illustrated above, 39.1% of the respondents are conservative, 48.9% are proactive, meanwhile 11.9% are not interested in investing in the energy storage industry. The high proportion of proactive respondents suggests optimism about the future potential of the energy storage sector, particularly as it plays a key role in supporting renewable energy integration and grid stability. On the other hand, the sizable conservative group indicates concerns due to its high initial investment costs on infrastructure, technological uncertainties, and unclear policy support. These factors discourage immediate investment and lead investors to a wait-and-see approach to the investment. As a result, although the majority of the population presented a positive perspective, cautious investment behavior could slow the pace of industry expansion in the short term.